Lawgiver



The Lawgiver was mentioned and quoted in the first two Apes movies of the series, but only appeared in the final Apes film, 1973's Battle for the Planet of the Apes, played by actor-director John Huston. In Planet of the Apes and Beneath the Planet of the Apes the Lawgiver's writings and quotes formed the basis of the apes' system of laws and customs, particularly with regard to humans, whom the Lawgiver had declared "the devil's pawn", to be shunned and driven out, if not destroyed outright. Statues of the Lawgiver were common around Ape City; when the gorilla army saw a vision of such a statue bleeding, they panicked, showing their regard for this icon. (APJ: Planet of the Apes, Beneath the Planet of the Apes)By the time the Lawgiver appeared at the beginning and end of Battle in a flash-forward to the year 2670, the children he addressed (as he narrated the story of Caesar) were a mix of both humans and apes; the joint society Caesar ultimately promoted appeared to have succeeded, and instead of condemning humans, the Lawgiver had accepted them as his students. However, it is also possible that the tear shed by the statue of Caesar at the end of the film is an indication that his efforts would ultimately fail. Since The Lawgiver spoke of "evil men who betrayed God's trust", it is possible that zealots perverted his peaceful teachings over the centuries following Battle. (APJ: Battle for the Planet of the Apes) The Lawgiver was the adoptive grandfather of human Sullivan and chimp Alaya, and resided in the city of Mak. In 2680, while he was teaching about peace from the Sacred Scrolls, he was tragically gunned down by a disguised assailant. An autopsy later confirmed that he was shot at least 26 times by a Stormgewehr Mitrailleuse Machine Gun. The assassin was later revealed as Sully's mute human friend Chaika. (BOOM!: Planet of the Apes: The Long War) NotesEdit Dr. Zaius with a statue of the LawgiverWriting the story outline for Battle.. (then named Epic of the Planet of the Apes), John William Corrington & Joyce Hooper Corrington were more explicit in their view on the altered timeline than in anything that appeared on-screen: the prologue and epilogue of the movie are set in 2670 A.D.; the Lawgiver is now benevolent towards humans (as opposed to the anti-human fanatic suggested in Planet.. and Beneath..) - "this difference is due to alterations of that historical track which we have seen worked out in previous films...these changes in ape history are due primarily to the influence of Caesar on apes and humans". However, the Corringtons most likely misinterpreted the clear intent of Paul Dehn, who wrote Beneath, Escape and Conquest, as well as the final revision of Battle. He stated in an early '70's interview, "The whole thing has become a very logical development in the form of a circle. I have a complete chronology of the time circle mapped out".[1]The early scripts for Battle suggested that The Lawgiver should resemble Virgil, perhaps to indicate his ancestry.The Lawgiver is speaking in the year 2670. Coincidentally (or perhaps not), the opening scene of the first movie began in 2673 with Taylor musing on what has happened back on Earth in his absence.Malibu Comics' Planet of the Apes comics, revealed that it was Jacob, son of Virgil, who wrote the highly damning passages of the 'Sacred Scrolls'.The same comic series climaxed with the summoning of the ghost of Caesar, who declares, "That is the name I was once called. But now I am known as the Lawgiver."Marvel Comics' original Apes story Terror On The Planet Of The Apes included a 'first Lawgiver' as head of the city, suggesting there may have been more than just one Lawgiver, thus making it a title of authority in ape society, given to only the holder of one specific and powerful office.Malibu Comics' Planet of the Apes: The Forbidden Zone series featured Dogen - Lawgiver of the ape/human town of Primacy.MR Comics' Revolution on the Planet of the Apes: Ape Shall Not Kill Ape included a confrontation between two rival Lawgivers - Greybeard and Augustus.BOOM! Studios' writer Daryl Gregory has stated in interviews that the Lawgiver featured in their Planet of the Apes: The Long War #1 is "definitely the character we met at the end of 'Battle'",[2] "the Moses-like figure referenced throughout the movies, and played by John Huston for a few minutes in the last movie."[3] Planet of the Apes: The Long War is set a decade after the coda of Battle. Gregory has also said the city-state of Mak (where his story is set) is "a larger metropolis somewhere west of New York."[3] "If Ape City is New York, then this is Chicago."[2]TriviaEditThe character of the Lawgiver, as originally depicted in the first and second movies, was based on Haristas from the original novel - a revered ape from "thousands of years ago" whose dogma is challenged by some of the chimpanzee characters. There is a strong possibility that Joe Wong's image from early costume tests for Planet of the Apes was used as the model for the Lawgiver statues featured in that movie, which would have been designed around that time.There were two eight-foot Lawgiver statues made. One of them - featured in many publicity photos with Dr. Zaius and with Taylor, and the only full-sized Lawgiver used on screen - ended up in Arthur P. Jacobs' backyard and was sold by his widow Natalie Trundy around 1998. Ed Gogin, a Planet of the Apes collector from Irvine, California, outbid 20th Century Fox, who wanted the statue for their archive, and it remains in his possession.[4] The other statue was made for Jacobs' friend Sammy Davis Jr., and is currently owned by an actor friend of Roddy McDowall's.[5] One of these two was featured in the Behind the Planet of the Apes documentary hosted by Roddy McDowall in 1998.In the original 1968 PotA, there was a Lawgiver bust featured in the courtroom scene which has been in a private collectors' possession in the Eastern U.S. since its purchase in 1971 from a 20th Century Fox Auction and is in mint condition. There is also rumoured to be a Lawgiver bust which is fragmented, the remains held in a private collection in Florida for many decades and now residing in England.A painted fiberglass statue was constructed for the scene in Beneath the Planet of the Apes where the mutants project an illusion of the Lawgiver weeping blood, with internal tubing attached to the eyes for the bleeding effect. The statue falls and shatters during the scene, but the head survived intact as a bust measuring 28" x 13" x 14" and weighing 17 lbs. It was held in a private collection for several years and auctioned in December 2010 for $29,500.An earlier draft script for Battle written by Paul Dehn included details of Zeno, an orangutan member of the ape council who holds the balance of power between the chimp faction led by Pan, and the gorilla faction led by Aldo. A conspiracy between Zeno and Aldo ultimately leads to them killing Caesar and becoming joint rulers, Zeno becoming the Lawgiver depicted in Planet and Beneath.The scenes with the Lawgiver in Battle were originally written (by Dehn) for the final scene of Beneath the Planet of the Apes, where a group of children are being taught about how the armies of gorillas and mutants were all killed and how Taylor brought peace and harmony to all the survivors in the 47 years before his death. The teacher is a chimpanzee and the children are human. One very inquisitive boy is called 'Taylor', after their society's founder. It seems fair to assume that this is where the proposed Hybrid Child character would have appeared - the final evidence of the harmony that has been established. This ending was removed when Charlton Heston and Richard D. Zanuck decided to kill the characters of Taylor, Brent and Nova and have the entire planet destroyed.Sam Jaffe was originally signed as the Lawgiver, but turned down the role when he discovered he would have to shave off his eight-year-old beard in order to accommodate the ape facial appliances.[6]Jaffe was mistakenly listed as playing the Lawgiver in a magazine article publshed shortly after the completion of filming.[7]The final shot of the statue of Caesar shedding a tear was deliberately vague - the first Corrington outline seemed to suggest it was because of ape and human children fighting, and Dehn, writer of the earlier treatments and of the previous three movies stated that the tear on the statue of Caesar at the end of the film was to tell the audience that Caesar's efforts would ultimately fail.[8] The released version of the movie, though, could also interpret Caesar's tear as a tear of joy at the human/ape integration that he achieved.